System and method for progressive download using surplus network capacity

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods for providing the progressive download of media content using techniques that preferentially identify and use periods of surplus network capacity to maintain the content delivery. A buffer of a receiving system is maintained and pre-filled with enough content to bridge playback intervals where a network is unable to deliver content as fast as it is played out. Content delivery does not impact other users&#39; applications and use of the network and its resources since content is preferentially sent when surplus network capacity exists in the network. When no surplus network capacity is available, a user requesting content may be given the option to continue the delivery in the background so that the content may be played at a later time. The user may then resume their playback experience once the content has been completely delivered using surplus network capacity as it becomes available.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/761,302 filed on Apr. 15, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part ofU.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/395,485 filed on Feb. 27, 2009,which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/278,809filed on Apr. 5, 2006, which claims the benefit of U.S. ProvisionalApplication Ser. No. 60/668,864 filed Apr. 7, 2005, the entiredisclosures and contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention is directed generally to systems and methods forproviding progressive downloading of content over a network, and morespecifically, to progressive downloading of content using availablesurplus capacity of a network.

2. Description of the Related Art

Streaming online content while connected to a network is a popularmethod of delivering requested media content from networked servers forconsumption by a requestor. A familiar problem with streaming onlinecontent is that the network connecting the server and a receiver mayhave transient fluctuations in its ability to deliver the content,resulting in interruptions in the playback (or “playout”) session.Various methods have been proposed to mitigate this issue includingcontent compression to reduce the delivery rate, dynamic real-timeencoding to reduce the delivery rate/playback-quality to match thenetwork capability, and pre-buffering a short segment of the contentbefore allowing playback to start and thereafter filling the bufferfaster than the content can be played out until the end of the playbacksession. This last streaming method has become known as progressivedownload (or “PD”), and the technique is intended to build up a safetymargin in order to be able to maintain continuous playback during briefintervals when the server is unable to maintain the delivery rate to thereceiver over the network.

While designed to reduce and to avoid interruptions, progressivedownload is not immune to network impairments which persist long enoughto empty a buffer on a system receiving the content. In those cases theplayback session is forced to halt until the buffer can again bere-filled and the session recommences. It is therefore a commonexperience that existing progressive download techniques often fail toprovide a continuous playback session depending on the capabilities ofthe network.

Another growing problem is the impact that streaming large content fileshas on access networks including wired, fiber and wireless types.“Large” media content has the signature feature of consuming significantamounts of time and network resources during its delivery to or from anend user device. Commonly, consumer access networks are designed fordelivery of short bursts of data and network resource use and are notintended for long-term continuous use such as streaming media content.Streaming media content is widely acknowledged to be a principalchallenge to access network traffic engineers who try to satisfy thepeak use demands of many users with limited network resources. Thetypical outcome of widespread streaming adoption is network congestionwhich often is exhibited by slow network response for all users andtheir applications.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic generally representing an implementation of amedia content delivery system.

FIG. 2 is a schematic showing a detailed representation of the mediacontent delivery system shown in FIG. 1.

FIGS. 3A-3B are a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary process flowfor delivering media content.

FIG. 4 is another flow diagram illustrating an exemplary process flowfor delivering media content.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The embodiments described herein are generally directed to systems andmethods for providing the progressive download of media content usingtechniques that preferentially identify and use periods of surplusnetwork capacity to maintain the content delivery. As used herein, theterm surplus network capacity is defined as network capacity determinedby an access provider to be available in a network in view of the totalcapacity of a network and the usage of the network. As can beappreciated, the surplus network capacity for a network may varysubstantially over time (e.g., during peak use periods) and from oneservice provider to another. For example, an access provider may set athreshold at a predetermined percentage of a network's total capacity,such as 80% of total capacity. Any time that the network usage fallsbelow 80% of total capacity, the surplus may be used by the deliverysystem described herein so that the current usage does not exceed the80% threshold. Another access provider may have the same total capacity,but set the threshold at 90% of total capacity. In this example, anytime that the usage falls below 90% of total capacity, the surplus maybe used by the delivery system described herein so long as the currentusage does not exceed the 90% threshold. The predetermined percentagemay be any suitable percentage such as 50%, 90%, 98%, or the like. Thesurplus network capacity may be expressed as a percentage of totalnetwork capacity, as an absolute magnitude, or as any other suitablemetric. Further, the surplus network capacity of a network may refer tothe free bandwidth in the network as in the example provided above, butthe term is not so limited. In some scenarios the surplus networkcapacity available for use to download content using the methodsdescribed herein may be determined using other criteria such aspriorities, times of day, historical data, or the like.

Similar to existing progressive download methods, in some embodiments areceiver buffer is maintained and pre-filled with enough content tobridge playback intervals where a network is unable to deliver contentas fast as it is played out. A difference however is that the actualcontent delivery does not impact other users' applications and use ofthe network and its resources. This is accomplished by only streamingcontent when surplus network capacity exists in the network. Althoughpre-filling the receiver buffer may take relatively longer since onlysurplus network capacity is utilized, this method is less damaging tothe network and more likely to succeed towards the goal of uninterruptedplayback once playback does begin since at least some surplus networkcapacity was available to pre-fill the buffer in the first place (i.e.,the network is not completely congested).

During extended peak use periods, there may be no such surplus networkcapacity available. In those scenarios a user requesting content may begiven the option to continue the delivery in the background so that thecontent may be played at a later time. If background delivery isselected, the user can resume their playback experience once the contenthas been completely delivered using surplus network capacity as itbecomes available.

The embodiments described herein generally include systems and methodsthat execute on a client/server architecture. In some embodiments,client software executes on fixed or portable units including PC's,laptops, netbooks, mobile internet devices, cell phones, or other units.

In some embodiments, the following general sequence of steps isperformed. A user operating a receiving system selects a content filefor streaming delivery, wherein the streaming of the content file to thereceiving system begins. Content is delivered using methods thatpreferentially identify and use otherwise idle network capacity betweenthe networked sending system and receiving system. The receiving systemallows the received content to pre-fill a buffer to a calculatedthreshold level based on a computed filling rate of the buffer. Uponreaching the threshold level, playback begins. As content arrives it mayalso be cached onto storage onboard the receiving system. Once playbackbegins the receiving system may monitor the fill level of the buffer,and if buffer exhaustion occurs or is near to occurring, the user may bealerted and given the option to switch modes to background delivery.Otherwise playback continues until the user pauses the playback or theplayback of the content reaches the end. As can be appreciated, if theuser chooses to ignore alerts of pending buffer exhaustion,interruptions in playout are likely to occur as the buffer re-fills.

In one scenario, the user of a receiving system connects online via aweb browser application to a site that hosts a content delivery server.The user may select a media content title (e.g., a video, audio, orother media file) for streaming delivery and, after a short interval,the media content begins to play on the receiving system via a playerapplication. As the content is being played out on the receiving systemthe network may become unable to sustain the required delivery rate tokeep up with the playback. A short time later, a first user alert mayindicate to the user that playback cannot be continued. The user maythen be given the option to discontinue the playback and continue thedelivery in the background. The user may then accept this option and theplayback application terminates. At a later time, a second user alertmay be provided to inform the user that the content is now completelydownloaded on the receiving system. The user may then re-launch theplayer application and continue viewing or listening to the content fromthe point of interruption or from the beginning of the content. Becausethe content is then stored locally on the receiving system, the networkno longer influences the playback and the session may proceeduninterrupted to the end of the content. During both streaming andbackground downloading, network surplus capacity is used to avoidimpacting the quality of service for other users' applications andpreserving the network quality of experience.

In another scenario, a user may connect to a server using a receivingsystem and select a content title for streaming media delivery. After adelay the content may begin to play back on the receiving system. Duringthe playback session the network may occasionally become impaired andthe delivery rate may be reduced briefly. Because the user's progressivedownload application has buffered sufficient content prior to startingthe playback, the playback session continues uninterrupted. The deliveryof content is achieved preferentially using network surplus capacity toavoid impacting other users' applications and preserving their networkquality of experience. This process is transparent to the user and thestreaming experience is identical to streaming methods that wouldotherwise congest the network during peak use periods.

Various techniques for delivering files in a manner that avoids networkcongestion are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,500,010, which isincorporated herein by reference in its entirety. As described in detailin that reference, a file may be subdivided into segments fortransmission from the sending system to the receiving system. Aftersending a file segment from the sending system to the receiving system,it is possible to determine a maximum transfer rate available on thenetwork from the sending system to the receiving system as well asdetermine an actual transfer time for any particular segment. Thetransfer rate and the file segment size can both be dynamically adjustedbased on available bandwidth. If the network becomes congested, thesystem described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,500,010 can automatically reduce thetransfer rate and/or the size of file segments to avoid undesirablenetwork congestion. As greater network bandwidth becomes available, thesystem described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,500,010 can automatically increasethe transfer rate and/or adjust the file segment size accordingly. Thus,the system described in the above-referenced patent senses networkcongestion and dynamically adjusts the transfer rate and/or file segmentsize to avoid network congestion.

A content delivery system 100 is shown in FIG. 1 to include a sendingsystem 102 and a receiving system 104 both communicatively linked to anetwork 106. The sending system 102 may be comprised of a computersystem or a plurality of collocated or distributed computer systems suchas a servers, databases, storage units, routers, switches, firewalls, orother such devices, connected via fiber, wireline, or wireless means tothe network 106. For the sake of clarity, the various components areshown in FIG. 1 as the sending system 102.

The receiving system 104 may be collocated with a DVR, PC, networkstorage unit, client work station, television set top box, modem,gateway, or other such devices such as a personal data assistant (PDA),portable audio-video player, cellular communication device such as acell phone or in a dedicated hardware unit. The receiving system 104 maybe connected to the network 106 via fiber, wireline, or wireless means.The network 106 may include one or more network components from theInternet or other networks, such as WANs, including but not limited towired (DSL, cable, powerline), fiber, wireless, satellite, and cellulartype networks. The network 106 may include other conventional networkcomponents such as but not limited to modems, routers, bridges,gateways, network interfaces, cabled transmissions, wirelesstransmissions, local area networks (LANs), access networks, providernetworks, and peer-to-peer arrangements. The sending system 102 may beconfigured for sending a media file 116 over the network 106 to thereceiving system 104.

The sending system 102 includes an interface 110 to access the network106, a processor 112, and storage 114 containing the media file 116 tobe transmitted over the network to the receiving system 104 andcontaining one or more modules with instructions to implement contentdelivery methods. The receiving system 104 includes an interface 118 toaccess the network 106, a processor 120, and storage 122 to store copiesof the media file 116 received from the sending system 102 and to storeone or more modules to implement instructions regarding content deliverymethods. It is understood that the receiving system 104 may be locatedat an end user's location or be located at some intermediary networklocation. For example, the receiving system 104 may comprise anintermediary server operative to serve as a caching module fordistributing content geographically closer to a plurality of end users.

FIG. 2 further illustrates a functional decomposition of the elements ofthe system 100 provided in some embodiments. As shown, the media file116 is available to a streaming server 141 of the sending system 102,which is communicatively linked to the receiving system 104 through thenetwork 106. The receiving system 104 includes a computing platform thatmay in some embodiments include a PC, laptop, netbook, mobile internetdevice, cell phone, media reader, media player, or other system. It isunderstood that FIG. 2 shows one grouping of functional elements butthat other combinations of elements linked into a common or separatephysical units are also possible.

In operation, the incoming media file stream is processed by a streamingclient 143 software module of the receiving system 104, whichcoordinates the transfer with the streaming server 141 over the network106 using methods that preferentially use surplus network capacity withthe goal of not adversely affecting other unrelated traffic sharing thenetwork 106. In some embodiments the transfer of the media file 116 isaccomplished using methods further described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,500,010entitled “Adaptive File Delivery System and Method.”

The receiving system 104 shown in FIG. 2 also includes a processor 144and memory 145 for executing stored software instructions related to theembodiments described herein. The streaming client 143 software modulereceives the incoming media file 116 from the streaming server 141 ofthe sending system 102. The streaming client 143 transfers the contentsreceived to a temporary buffer storage 146 and in some embodiments to amass storage unit 149. A media playback engine 147 takes the contentfrom the buffer 146 and processes it for a media presentation device 148which may be integrated into the receiving system 104 or in someembodiments may be isolated. For example, in some embodiments the mediapresentation device 148 may include a separate video display screen andaudio speakers.

In some embodiments the media playback engine 147 takes content from thebuffer 146 when the buffer reaches a computed pre-fill threshold. Thepre-fill threshold may be computed to sustain continuous playback onceplayback has begun. The pre-fill threshold may be computed based on thebuffer fill rate, the content size, the playback rate, and the like.

As can be appreciated, in certain scenarios the buffer 146 may becomeexhausted such as during periods of extended congestion in the network106. In these situations a user may elect to continue transferring themedia file 116 in the background using surplus network capacity into thelocal storage 149 of the receiving system 104. Once the media file 116is completely transferred to the local storage 149, the media playbackengine 147 may be used to play back the media file 116 (as depicted bythe dashed line between the local storage 149 and the media playbackengine 147).

FIGS. 3A-3B illustrate an exemplary process 150 that may be implementedby the system 100 shown in FIG. 2 according to an embodiment of thepresent disclosure. The process 150 begins when the user, through anapplication executing on a user's receiving system, requests a mediacontent file (e.g., image, video, audio, or the like) in step 151. Insome embodiments this is performed using a web browser application bybrowsing and selecting a title of a particular media content file. Thefile streaming begins as the streaming server 141 of the sending system102 starts to stream content (e.g., the media file 116) to the receivingsystem 104. A transfer process may be used that preferentially utilizessurplus bandwidth of the network 106 when it is available.

The streaming client 143 provides control and status information to thestreaming server 141 that the streaming server 141 uses to control thepace of data flow to the receiving system 104. In one scenario,described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,500,010 entitled “Adaptive File DeliverySystem and Method,” the streaming server 141 determines the maximumaverage throughput rate of the data flow from the sending system 102 tothe receiving system 104, Rmax, which is then enforced by either thereceiving system 104 or the sending system 102, for example, by pacingthe rate of requests from the streaming client 143 for subsequentportions of the content file being transferred. Rmax can be determinedby the streaming server 141 by comparing the uncongested link capacitybetween the sending system 102 and the receiving system 104 with thethroughput reported by the streaming client 143 of the receiving system.

The streaming client 143 may then receive a file header or othermetadata from the streaming server 141 prior to the actual file contentbeing transferred to the streaming client in step 152. The header filemay be transferred over the network 106 using only surplus networkcapacity. This header or metadata may include file detail used to signalinformation to the streaming client 143 that is used to process theprogressive download session. In some embodiments the metadata includesthe file size, content size and media playout run time. The playout ratemay then be determined for example by computing the ratio of the contentsize to the playout run time in step 153.

The media content received from the sending system 102 using surplusnetwork capacity is then placed into the buffer 146 of the receivingsystem 104 in step 154. A separate process monitors the filling rate ofthe buffer in step 155. In some scenarios the filling rate may not beconstant and can be averaged in order to obtain a reliable estimate ofthe filling rate. In some embodiments this averaging may be taken over acertain number (e.g., 5, 10, 25, or the like) of request/receiveiterations of the transfers of content file segments between thestreaming server 141 and the streaming client 143. In other embodimentsthe averaging may be accomplished by sampling the total number of bytesof the content file that have arrived in a given time interval.

If a reliable estimate of the buffer filling rate is obtained indecision 156, a buffer pre-fill threshold is determined in step 157.Otherwise, the process 150 continues to receive content into the buffer.As can be appreciated, a separate process (not shown) may copy anycontent arriving into the buffer into local storage (e.g., the localstorage 149) for potential local playout at a later time.

In some embodiments, the buffer pre-fill threshold may be determined bycomparing the buffer filling rate (determined in step 155) with theplayout rate (determined in step 153). In one embodiment the bufferpre-fill threshold is given by:bufferFill=MAX{contentSize*[1−fillRate/playoutRate],0}+pad.

It is understood that this estimate may vary over time during thecontent transfer, for example, as the fill rate varies according tonetwork conditions. Accordingly, the buffer fill level may beover-estimated by a safety factor (i.e., a “pad”), thereby improving theprobability of completing an interruption-free playback session.Additional factors including historical transfer performance for thecurrent network attachment point, time of day, and other indications ofnetwork ability to complete the transfer may also be factored into thebuffer fill level estimation.

When the buffer pre-fill threshold is reached in step 158, contentplayout is allowed to begin in step 161. For example, playout may beperformed using a player application or media playback engine that drawscontent from the buffer 146. Otherwise, if the buffer pre-fill thresholdis not reached, the user may be given the option to select backgrounddelivery of the content in decision 159. The option may be presented tothe user via an application user interface or in another suitablemanner. If the user signals to the streaming client 143 that backgrounddelivery mode should be selected, a background delivery flag is set instep 160, and the receipt of the content on the receiving systemproceeds without streaming playback in step 164. Otherwise, the buffercontinues filling (step 154) until the pre-fill threshold is reached.

Once the buffer pre-fill threshold is reached, the streaming clientbegins playout from the buffer in step 161. Then, the playout completiontime is computed in step 162. If the content file is completely receivedin decision 163 shown in FIG. 3B, and the user did not select backgrounddelivery in step 176, the process 150 ends. If the user selectedbackground delivery in step 176, a first alert may be provided to theuser to indicate that the entire file has been stored locally in step177. The user may then begin or resume playout of the content file instep 178. The user may resume playout of the content file from any pointincluding the beginning of the content file, the point where thereplayout was stopped due to buffer exhaustion, or any user-selected pointin the content file. As can be appreciated, playout may continue untilthe end of content file or until the user terminates the playerapplication. If the content file is not completely received, the resultof decision 163 is NO, and the receiving system 104 continues to fillthe buffer 146 with the content file in step 164. A separate process(not shown) may copy any content arriving into the buffer into localstorage (e.g., the local storage 149) for potential local playout at alater time.

If the user has selected background delivery in decision 165, theprocess 150 loops and continues filling the buffer and emptying itscontents into local storage. Otherwise, the buffer filling rate ismonitored and calculated in step 166. The buffer filling rate may bemonitored and calculated as described above with reference to step 155.When a reliable estimate of the filling rate has not yet been obtained,the result of decision 167 is NO, and the process 150 loops back tocontinue to receive subsequent segments of the content file in step 163.Otherwise, when a good estimate of the filling rate is obtained, theprocess 150 continues to a delivery completion prediction module in step169. In some embodiments, the predicted delivery completion time may beobtained by dividing the filling rate by the remaining un-receivedcontent file portion.

The buffer fill threshold may then be computed in step 170, and if thecurrent buffer level is substantially below the current buffer fillthreshold a determination of buffer exhaustion or imminent exhaustionmay be detected in step 171 and decision 172. If the buffer is at ornear empty, the user may be alerted (e.g., via an application userinterface) and given the option of selecting background delivery mode instep 174. If the user selects background delivery, a background deliveryflag is set in step 175, the streaming playback terminates, and the restof the content file is transferred into local storage by looping throughsteps 163,164, and 165. Otherwise, the process 150 continues until thecontent file is completely received and played out or the userterminates the session.

It is understood that if the user chooses to ignore alerts of pendingbuffer exhaustion that interruptions in playout are likely to occur asthe buffer re-fills. One advantage of providing the option to continuereceiving the content file with background delivery is to offer the userrecourse for later playback from local storage, as opposed to simplyrequiring the user to terminate the session without receiving thecontent. Additionally, in some scenarios the content delivery mayautomatically switch to background delivery upon pending bufferexhaustion, for instance, when a preconfigured policy rule has beenpre-selected on the receiving system by the user. As an example, thisfeature may be beneficial if small children are using the receivingsystem or it is otherwise inconvenient to solicit/obtain userinteraction during playback.

FIG. 4 illustrates a process 200 that may be implemented by the system100 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. Generally, in cases where the playout buffer146 gets exhausted, ancillary content (e.g., advertising or othercontent) may be played back during the re-buffering period. Theancillary content may be downloaded to the receiving system 104 afterthe requested content is requested or at a prior time period. Byproviding ancillary content during the re-buffering period, the timeinterval while re-buffering is occurring is utilized rather than simplyproviding the user with a “re-buffering” status message.

In some embodiments, the user of a receiving system requests a contentfile from a sending system in step 204. Prior to sending the requestedcontent, in step 206 ancillary content is sent that may be used later toplayback during subsequent intervals during re-buffering when the bufferbecomes exhausted. Alternatively, the ancillary content may already beresident on the playback device, having been sent during a previousdelivery transaction. Next, the buffer may be pre-filled with therequested content to a computed pre-fill threshold using surplus networkcapacity in step 208. During this ‘pre-fill’ interval, the playback ofthe requested content has not yet begun. After the ancillary content hasbeen received and after the buffer reaches the computed fill level,playback of the requested content may begin in step 210. Duringplayback, if network congestion results in exhaustion of the buffer, theplayback is halted while the buffer refills in step 212. The user may bepresented with an indication that re-buffering is occurring. During there-buffering interval, previously stored ancillary content is played tofill the time interval in step 214. When the buffer has once againreached its computed fill threshold, playback of the requested contentis resumed in step 216. As can be appreciated, once the buffer reachesits computed fill threshold, playback of the requested content maycommence immediately. Alternatively, playback of the requested contentmay commence after the ancillary content is played back to a logicalbreaking point. As an example, in the case where the ancillary contentincludes video advertisements, a logical breaking point may be the endof a particular advertisement.

The foregoing described embodiments depict different componentscontained within, or connected with, different other components. It isto be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary,and that in fact many other architectures can be implemented whichachieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangementof components to achieve the same functionality is effectively“associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, anytwo components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality canbe seen as “associated with” each other such that the desiredfunctionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermedialcomponents. Likewise, any two components so associated can also beviewed as being “operably connected”, or “operably coupled”, to eachother to achieve the desired functionality.

While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shownand described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that,based upon the teachings herein, changes and modifications may be madewithout departing from this invention and its broader aspects and,therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope allsuch changes and modifications as are within the true spirit and scopeof this invention. Furthermore, it is to be understood that theinvention is solely defined by the appended claims. It will beunderstood by those within the art that, in general, terms used herein,and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appendedclaims) are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term“including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” theterm “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term“includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,”etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that if aspecific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such anintent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence ofsuch recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid tounderstanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of theintroductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claimrecitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed toimply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinitearticles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing suchintroduced claim recitation to inventions containing only one suchrecitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases“one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or“an” (e.g., “a” and/or “an” should typically be interpreted to mean “atleast one” or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use ofdefinite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, evenif a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitlyrecited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitationshould typically be interpreted to mean at least the recited number(e.g., the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without othermodifiers, typically means at least two recitations, or two or morerecitations).

Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appendedclaims.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A method for transferring content from asending system to a receiving system, the sending system and thereceiving system being part of a network configured to handle a firstnetwork traffic and a second network traffic, the second network traffichaving a higher priority than the first network traffic, the methodcomprising: receiving a first portion of a requested content file in abuffer of the receiving system, wherein the first portion is sent by thesending system over a network as a streaming media file, the receivingof the requested content file being associated with the first networktraffic; playing the received portion of the streaming media file on thereceiving system; providing a first alert to a user of the receivingsystem that provides a choice to continue receiving segments of therequested content file using a background delivery mode; receiving aninstruction from the user in response to the first alert requesting thebackground delivery mode for delivery of the requested content file;suspending playing of the received portion of the streaming media fileon the receiving system; and receiving a remaining portion of therequested content file in the background delivery mode from the sendingsystem using surplus network capacity, the surplus network capacitybeing an amount of network capacity determined to be available at agiven time period for handling the first network traffic withoutadversely affecting the second network traffic in the network, whereinthe background delivery mode includes: stopping or pausing the playingof the received portion of the streaming media file; receiving theremaining portion of the requested content file using the surplusnetwork capacity; and storing the remaining portion of the requestedcontent file in a local storage of the receiving system for a subsequentplayback of the requested content file.
 2. The method of claim 1,further comprising: prior to providing the first alert, monitoring thefill level of the buffer during the playing of the received portion ofthe streaming media file; and determining that the buffer is at or nearexhaustion during playout of the requested content file; whereinproviding the first alert to the user occurs in response to determiningthat the buffer is at or near exhaustion.
 3. The method of claim 1,further comprising: providing a second alert to the user of thereceiving system that indicates that the remaining portion of therequested content file has been received by the receiving system;receiving an instruction from the user in response to the second alertto initiate playing of the requested content file on the receivingsystem; and initiating playing of the requested content file on thereceiving system.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first portion ofthe requested content file is received from the sending system using thesurplus network capacity.
 5. The method of claim 1 wherein receiving aninstruction from the user comprises interpreting a preconfigured policyrule set by the user.
 6. A receiving system coupled to sending systemvia a network, the sending system and the receiving system being part ofa network configured to handle a first network traffic and a secondnetwork traffic, the second network traffic having a higher prioritythan the first network traffic, the system comprising: a communicationsinterface configured to receive a requested streaming media content filefrom the sending system via the network, the receiving of the requestedcontent file being associated with the first network traffic; a bufferconfigured to store the received content file; a processor configured toplay the content file and to provide a first alert to a user of thereceiving system that provides a choice to receive the requested contentfile using a background delivery mode; and a user-operable input deviceconfigured to receive an instruction from the user in response to thefirst alert to thereby request the background delivery mode for deliveryof the requested content file; wherein the communications interface isfurther configured to transmit the request for the background deliverymode for delivery of the requested content file to the sending systemand to receive the requested content file in the background deliverymode that uses surplus capacity of the network, wherein the backgrounddelivery mode includes: stopping or pausing the playing of the receivedportion of the streaming media file, receiving the remaining portion ofthe requested content file using the surplus network capacity, andstoring the remaining portion of the requested content file in a localstorage of the receiving system for a subsequent playback of therequested content file, and wherein the surplus network capacity is anamount of network capacity determined to be available at a given timeperiod for handling the first network traffic without adverselyaffecting the second network traffic in the network.
 7. The system ofclaim 6 wherein, prior to the processor providing the first alert to theuser of the receiving system, the communications interface is configuredto receive an initial portion of the requested content file and theprocessor is configured to initiate playout of the initial portion ofthe requested content file, the processor being further configured to:monitor a fill level of the buffer during the playout of the requestedcontent file; and determine that the buffer is at or near exhaustionduring playout of the requested content file; wherein the processor isconfigured to provide the first alert to the user occurs in response todetermining that the buffer is at or near exhaustion.
 8. The system ofclaim 7 wherein the communications interface is further configured toreceive the initial portion of the requested content file using thesurplus network capacity, and wherein the background delivery mode usedto receive the remaining portion of the requested content file isinitiated based on a usage of a total capacity of the network relativeto a threshold value.
 9. The system of claim 7 wherein the processor isfurther configured to: halt playout of the received content file inresponse to the user request for background delivery; provide a secondalert to the user of the receiving system to indicate that the requestedcontent has been received by the receiving system; and the userinterface is further configured to receive an instruction from the userin response to the second alert to cause the receiving system to playout the requested content file on the receiving system wherein the userinstruction indicates playout of the entire requested content file orplayout of the requested file content from a point at which playout washalted.
 10. The system of claim 6 wherein the processor is furtherconfigured to provide a second alert to the user of the receiving systemto indicate that the requested content has been received by thereceiving system; and the user interface is further configured toreceive an instruction from the user in response to the second alert tocause the receiving system to play out the requested content file on thereceiving system.
 11. The system of claim 6 wherein the user-operableinput device is configured to receive the instruction from the user inresponse to the first alert as a preconfigured policy rule selected bythe user prior to receiving any portion of the requested content file tothereby request the background delivery mode for delivery of therequested content file.
 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the surplusnetwork capacity is based on network capacity determined by an accessprovider to be available in the network in view of a total capacity ofthe network and a usage of the network at the given time period.
 13. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the threshold is 90% of the total capacity.14. The method of claim 1, wherein the background delivery mode used toreceive the remaining portion of the requested content file is initiatedbased on a usage of a total capacity of the network relative to athreshold value.
 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the requestedcontent file is completely stored in the local storage before thesubsequent playback of the requested content file.
 16. The method ofclaim 15, further comprising: providing a second alert to the user aftercompletely storing at least the remaining portion of the requestedcontent file in the local storage; receiving an instruction from theuser in response to the second alert to initiate playing of therequested content file on the receiving system; and thereafter,initiating playing of the requested content file on the receivingsystem.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the remaining portion of therequested content file is stored in the local storage via a buffer ofthe receiving system.
 18. The method of claim 12, wherein the surplusnetwork capacity is based on network capacity determined by an accessprovider to be available in the network in view of a total capacity ofthe network and a usage of the network at the given time period.
 19. Themethod of claim 12, wherein the background delivery mode includesstoring the entire remaining portion of the requested content file in alocal storage of the receiving system for a subsequent playback of therequested content file.
 20. The method of claim 12, wherein a triggerfor the background delivery mode is initiated based on a usage of atotal capacity of the network relative to a threshold value.